2006 Vision Awards Competition Winners
Download This Year's Entry Form
 The 2006
Vision Awards Annual Report Competition drew
an unprecedented number of submissions representing a broad range of
industries and organizational sizes. More than 2,500 entries
representing 21 countries were received, so competition was exceptionally tough.Annual Reports were judged in peer-level competitions,
which are described in the classes below. To view the winners for
each competition, simply click on the class name. A winners'
gallery profile is available for winning annual reports whose entry form
indicated participation.
|
|
Flag Key |
 |
Fortune 500® |
 |
Fortune 1000® |
 |
Forbes Global 2000® |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
Austria |
Bermuda |
Canada |
China |
Czech
Republic |
Germany |
India |
Indonesia |
Japan |
Korea |
Luxembourg |
Mexico |
Netherlands |
Norway |
Saudi Arabia |
South Africa |
Sri Lanka |
Switzerland |
Turkey |
UK |
USA |
|
|
Competition-Wide, Special Achievement Winners |
| |
|
Competition Class Winners |
| |
Up to
$10
Million |
$10 Million -
$100 Million |
$100 Million -
$1 Billion |
$1+ Billion |
|
Aerospace & Defense |
Full Results |
|
Agribusiness |
Full Results |
|
Automobiles & Components |
Full Results |
|
Banks |
Commercial |
10,000+ Employees
↕ Commercial
↕
Up to 10,000 Employees |
|
Thrifts & Mortgage
Finance |
|
Biotechnology |
Full Results |
Full Results |
|
Business, Engineering &
Construction Services |
Full Results |
10,000+ Employees
Up to 10,000 Employees |
|
Chemicals |
Full Results |
|
Conglomerates, Holding Companies
& Diversified Investments |
Full Results |
|
Consumer Products & Services |
Consumables: Food &
Beverage |
Consumables: Food &
Beverage |
|
Consumables: Household &
Personal |
|
Durables: Household,
Textile, Apparel & Luxury |
|
Services: Hotels,
Restaurants & Leisure |
|
Educational |
Full Results |
| |
Up to
$10
Million |
$10 Million -
$100 Million |
$100 Million -
$1 Billion |
$1+ Billion |
Energy:
Equipment & Services |
Equipment & Services |
|
Up to
1,000 Employees
← Oil, Gas & Fuels
→
1,000+ Employees |
|
Equipment, Machinery &
Instruments |
Full Results |
Full Results |
|
Financials |
Capital Markets |
|
Up to 10,000 Employees ←
Diversified Services
→
10,000+ Employees |
|
Government |
Full Results |
Full Results |
|
Healthcare |
Providers & Services |
Providers & Services |
|
Equipment & Supplies |
|
Insurance & Related |
$1+ Billion, 100
- 10,000 Employees
All Others |
|
Materials / Natural Resources |
Up to 10,000 Employees
10,000+ Employees |
|
Media / Communications |
Full Results |
|
Non-Profits |
Full Results |
Full Results |
Full Results |
|
Pharmaceuticals |
Full Results |
Full Results |
| |
Up to
$10
Million |
$10 Million -
$100 Million |
$100 Million -
$1 Billion |
$1+ Billion |
|
Real Estate / REIT |
Full Results |
Full Results |
Full Results |
|
Retailing |
Full Results |
|
Technology |
Computers, Peripherals, Hardware &
Equipment |
|
Software |
|
Semiconductors &
Related |
IT Services |
|
Telecommunications |
Full Results |
|
Transportation & Logistics |
Full Results |
|
Utilities |
Gas/Electric |
Gas/Electric |
|
Gas |
|
Multiple/Water/Traders |
Multiple/Water/Traders |
| |
Up to
$10
Million |
$10 Million -
$100 Million |
$100 Million -
$1 Billion |
$1+ Billion |
|
HOW THE COMPETITION WAS JUDGED
INTRODUCTION
The competition was judged by a field of communications
professionals affiliated with LACP. Their expertise spans a
broad spectrum of PR functions ranging from corporate, executive,
and internal communications for Fortune 500 organizations to
product, service, and non-profit publicity expertise. Judges
are screened to ensure that there are no conflicts of interest.
COMPETITION CLASSES
Award results are based on the judging of submissions within
peer-level competition classes. Competition classes are
established to create the most level playing field possible between
entries. They are determined according to company size, annual
revenue, and other pertinent factors included on the entry form.
SCORING
Scoring is derived according to a proprietary judging system
developed by LACP, which assigns point values to various criteria of
an entry. The Competition Scorecard provides further
details on these criteria as well as the scores earned. A composite
score, based on a 100-point scale, is then determined by summing the
results of all judging criteria.
Narrative descriptions can be correlated to an entry’s scores
according to the following chart:
|
Point Scale |
|
|
0-10 |
0-20 |
0-30 |
0-100
(Total Score) |
Narrative Description |
|
10 |
19-20 |
28-30 |
91-100 |
Superb – Among the Very Best Judged |
|
9 |
17-18 |
25-27 |
81-90 |
Excellent – Outstanding, Strong Performance |
|
8 |
15-16 |
22-24 |
71-80 |
Very Good – Positive Feedback from Judging Staff |
|
7 |
| | |
